Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of ZooCompliancyReport

Timestamp:

Sep 16, 2010, 12:14:58 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

venka

Comment:

--

ZooCompliancyReport

@@ -1 +1 @@
 = ZOO Project WPS compliancy testing =
 
-In response to the report named '''CIP-ICT-PSP-2009-3 - 250474''' made by 52°North for the client/project:" BRIdging SErvices, Information and Data for Europe" (BRISEIDE), we prepared a new compliancy test.
+In response to the presentation entitled entitled "COMPLIANCE TESTING OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR WEB PROCESSING SERVICES" (as below) ;
+[http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_show.php?id=3604 link].
+The presentation is based on report  No. CIP-ICT-PSP-2009-3-250474 entitled “Web Processing Service Study” contributed by Bastian Schäffer from 52°North for the client/project : BRIdging SErvices, Information and Data for Europe [http://www.briseide.eu/ link].
 
 In above mentioned report, some unusual behaviour of the ZOO Kernel was pointed out. Hence, the ZOO PSC decided to answer to this report by making his own report about ZOO Project compliancy testing using the same way as in the report.
 
-First note about the report we are currently writing, we weren't able to use XMLSpy 2007 Professional version as no more Evaluation version is available, so we used the XMLSpy 2011 Professional one as we can use it for an evaluation period of 30 days.
+First note about this response that we are currently preparing, we weren't able to use XMLSpy 2007 Professional version as no more Evaluation version is available, so we used the XMLSpy 2011 Professional one as we can use it for an evaluation period of 30 days.
 
 All the following requests give documents which are valid (using XMLSpy 2011 Professional) against the used schemas.
@@ -13 +15 @@
 In the section 5.5 of the report an error was pointed out about some unexpected metadata : namely Test attribute to the Metadata node getting the "Demo" value. This was due to wrong ZCFG files of the first Services we made in the begining of the 2009 year.
 
-The right URL to tun this test is wrong, you would use this one : 
+The right URL to tun this test is wrong, one would use this one : 
 
 http://zoo-project.org/cgi-bin-new/zoo_loader.cgi?REQUEST=GetCapabilities&SERVICE=WPS&version=1.0.0
 
-The annex II linked to this section contains strangely a !ProcessDescription document when it shall be a Capabilities Document instead. Maybe we don't have the final version of the report (I hope so ;)).
+The annex II linked to this section contains strangely a !ProcessDescription document when it shall be a Capabilities Document instead. Maybe we don't have the final version of the report  (at least ZOO-Team hope so).
 
-So for the !GetCapabilities request, the Capabilities document outputed by the ZOO Kernel is '''Valid'''.
+So for the !GetCapabilities request, the Capabilities document output by the ZOO Kernel is '''Valid'''.
 
 == !DescribeProcess request ==