Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of ZooCompliancyReport


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 16, 2010, 12:14:58 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
venka
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ZooCompliancyReport

    v22 v23  
    11= ZOO Project WPS compliancy testing =
    22
    3 In response to the report named '''CIP-ICT-PSP-2009-3 - 250474''' made by 52°North for the client/project:" BRIdging SErvices, Information and Data for Europe" (BRISEIDE), we prepared a new compliancy test.
     3In response to the presentation entitled entitled "COMPLIANCE TESTING OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR WEB PROCESSING SERVICES" (as below) ;
     4[http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_show.php?id=3604 link].
     5The presentation is based on report  No. CIP-ICT-PSP-2009-3-250474 entitled “Web Processing Service Study” contributed by Bastian Schäffer from 52°North for the client/project : BRIdging SErvices, Information and Data for Europe [http://www.briseide.eu/ link].
    46
    57In above mentioned report, some unusual behaviour of the ZOO Kernel was pointed out. Hence, the ZOO PSC decided to answer to this report by making his own report about ZOO Project compliancy testing using the same way as in the report.
    68
    7 First note about the report we are currently writing, we weren't able to use XMLSpy 2007 Professional version as no more Evaluation version is available, so we used the XMLSpy 2011 Professional one as we can use it for an evaluation period of 30 days.
     9First note about this response that we are currently preparing, we weren't able to use XMLSpy 2007 Professional version as no more Evaluation version is available, so we used the XMLSpy 2011 Professional one as we can use it for an evaluation period of 30 days.
    810
    911All the following requests give documents which are valid (using XMLSpy 2011 Professional) against the used schemas.
     
    1315In the section 5.5 of the report an error was pointed out about some unexpected metadata : namely Test attribute to the Metadata node getting the "Demo" value. This was due to wrong ZCFG files of the first Services we made in the begining of the 2009 year.
    1416
    15 The right URL to tun this test is wrong, you would use this one :
     17The right URL to tun this test is wrong, one would use this one :
    1618
    1719http://zoo-project.org/cgi-bin-new/zoo_loader.cgi?REQUEST=GetCapabilities&SERVICE=WPS&version=1.0.0
    1820
    19 The annex II linked to this section contains strangely a !ProcessDescription document when it shall be a Capabilities Document instead. Maybe we don't have the final version of the report (I hope so ;)).
     21The annex II linked to this section contains strangely a !ProcessDescription document when it shall be a Capabilities Document instead. Maybe we don't have the final version of the report  (at least ZOO-Team hope so).
    2022
    21 So for the !GetCapabilities request, the Capabilities document outputed by the ZOO Kernel is '''Valid'''.
     23So for the !GetCapabilities request, the Capabilities document output by the ZOO Kernel is '''Valid'''.
    2224
    2325== !DescribeProcess request ==

Search

Context Navigation

ZOO Sponsors

http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/geolabs-logo.pnghttp://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/neogeo-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/apptech-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/3liz-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/gateway-logo.png

Become a sponsor !

Knowledge partners

http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/ocu-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/gucas-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/polimi-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/fem-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/supsi-logo.png http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/chrome/site/img/cumtb-logo.png

Become a knowledge partner

Related links

http://zoo-project.org/img/ogclogo.png http://zoo-project.org/img/osgeologo.png